top 200 commentsshow 500

[–]All_About_Figs 2507 points2508 points  (34 children)

My little bin of notifications would be pretty empty, mainly spam emails

[–]StaticDreams 1953 points1954 points  (22 children)

New Snapchat Notification! From Team Snapchat

[–]Capt_Burntbeard 577 points578 points  (11 children)

Always happens right after you snap that one cute girl from work to.

[–]StinkyDiaper 328 points329 points  (2 children)


[–]jsjdjdjjuh 160 points161 points  (0 children)


[–]Green_Bay_Fappers 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Opened Sun

[–]circadiankruger 90 points91 points  (7 children)

... To what? To what? Don't leave me hanging there, bruddah

[–]notveryrealatall 97 points98 points  (6 children)

To their dismay, I would assume

[–]PM_ur_Rump 32 points33 points  (1 child)

She must be jockin' Mike D.

[–]Goggles_Gamer15 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Unexpected Beastie Boys

[–]iPho3nix 20 points21 points  (3 children)

Handy tip, you can actually block Team Snapchat!

[–]abooth43 60 points61 points  (2 children)

But...then I'll get no notifications...

[–]Exaskryz 12 points13 points  (1 child)

It's truly for the best. Because that one time you do get a notification, you won't be heavily disappointed that it was just Team Snapchat. True story.

[–]yourpaljon 9637 points9638 points  (319 children)

Dang, I'd want that background

[–]JessicaBecause 8105 points8106 points  (237 children)

...aaaand your batteries dead.

[–]EnterPlayerTwo 2626 points2627 points  (212 children)

I'm never able to unplug my phone anyway.

[–]GuyWithRealFacts 1733 points1734 points  (194 children)

Due to the cost of making wireless phones with wireless networks, Apple and Samsung are slowly re-introducing the idea of a plugged in phone that runs off of a wired network.

Their research indicates that the younger generations do not remember the days of house phones and being tethered to the kitchen wall while mom does the dishes and listens to you talking about girls and video games, so these phone companies are on-pace to get away with rolling the technology backwards.

The future of 'mobile' phones will become 'mobile, plugged in phones' in the next decade or so touting the availability of 'the Nation's fastest wired grid' and 'fits into any outlet or USB port'.

[–]Pax-ton 830 points831 points  (14 children)

Name seems to check out.

[–]BaabyBear 147 points148 points  (12 children)


[–]kmaster54321 85 points86 points  (11 children)


[–]Walnutterzz 68 points69 points  (7 children)


[–]amsungsa2 19 points20 points  (2 children)


[–]jsjdjdjjuh 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Theyre not 'mobile phones"

THeyre portable phones

Not really good for being mobile. But they are good enough that you can unplugged on long enough to take them to the next charger

Like a laptop. You wouldn't use a laptop without keeping it plugged in Normally. But you can un plug it for a little while without losing your work

Thats Cell phones. They used to make them that you could have them unplugged 4 days. But now they're just portable

[–]juan_004 2 points3 points  (0 children)

they're going back some, I like my zenfone 3 cause it has a 2 day battery, got the zenfone zoom for my mom and hers lasts 4 days! 5k mAh is kinda impressive.

[–]Lil_o_Jerms 301 points302 points  (70 children)

Just like cable companies making a comeback.

Tired of having 30+ Network subscriptions, are you paying an arm and a leg?. Well now get 50+ networks for only $49.99 for the first year! Netflix and Hulu all included in the standard package. Act now and we'll throw in Disney Network for free. Like sports? For only $20 additional we'll throw in NBA, NFL, UFC, WWE Networks!

And we're back...

[–]mrsegraves 218 points219 points  (30 children)

Only if they don't run commercials. I've gone so long without seeing or hearing a commercial on TV or radio, closing a pop-up, etc that I just can't picture going back to the Dark Ages of commercials and an inability to pause my show/movie

[–]inucune 48 points49 points  (19 children)

There is one university radio station here that doesn't run ads, only bumps for their own shows, and a brief bump for any of their supporters ("x company offers x services, [contact info]"). the rest of the time, it is blues/jazz music.

Radio Garden-WSIE

[–]yzy_ 130 points131 points  (3 children)

This is like every university radio station

[–]informedvoice 13 points14 points  (1 child)

And noncommercial stations in every metro because the FCC doesn't allow "calls to action" on specific radio frequencies.

[–]trialoffears 40 points41 points  (9 children)

and a brief bump for any of their supporters ("x company offers x services, [contact info]").

What's sad is ads have become so bad you don't realize that is an ad. A good one i'd say, but still an ad.

[–]Zobrem 22 points23 points  (7 children)

These public radio ads are more like mentions and less like ads. They usually say something like "We'd like to thank our sponsors blank, blank, and blank for this segment." Sometimes they also throw in a quick line like "happy hour weekdays 2-4". It's always quick less than 10 seconds and it never feels jarring like those cringey scripted podcast commercials where they make the person pretend they actually use the product.

[–]trialoffears 7 points8 points  (2 children)

lol they are still ads. That's my point! Ads have become so intrusive and invasive that basic ads aren't considered ads anymore. And people need to stop acting like every local college town dosn't have there own local radio station. It's been that way for generations. Most of them like in my small city are in some way affiliated with NPR or PRI or the like.

[–]Trinitykill 16 points17 points  (1 child)

Except the whole reason these sponsors pay the radio station is so that they'll get mentioned. It's cheap, casual advertising but advertising nonetheless.

[–]Schrodingers__Cat 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Also known as NPR

[–]chevymonza 19 points20 points  (9 children)

I'd be happy with our ancient cable setup, with the plastic box and the buttons, tethered to the TV. Not a fan of the extra wire, but when you hit the button, the channel would change instantly.

Now, I hit a few buttons, wait five seconds, and if I hit the buttons correctly, the correct channel will come up. Sometimes the image isn't even pixelated or jumpy or anything.

[–]DonkeyWindBreaker 4 points5 points  (5 children)

Yes the amount of info coming through is such that buffering needs to be done. Such is analog vs digital

[–]DrFloyd5 7 points8 points  (4 children)

It’s not the amount. It’s the inconsistent speed. If all the bytes got to the receiver just in time it wouldn’t need to buffer. But you need the buffer to allow the slower bytes time to arrive.

Analog doesn’t buffer because all the information arrives just in time.

[–]tomsawing 50 points51 points  (16 children)

I wish they would give a $20 discount for getting rid of sports. They just bundle those channels in with other completely unrelated channels like AMC or FX so that you feel like no matter whether you prefer sports or scripted shows, you also have to have the other one. The future you're predicting would be an improvement, not a step backwards.

[–]MxG_Grimlock 28 points29 points  (4 children)

I wish they would drop all the other crap and let me just get the sports channels. The only thing I use canoe for is love sports.

[–]Owyn_Merrilin 35 points36 points  (2 children)

The only thing I use canoe for is love sports.

If fucking close to water is what you're after, bud light is cheaper.

[–]three18ti 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Don't call it a comeback, I've been here for years...?

[–]harassmaster 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Remember when unlimited data was a thing, then wasn’t, now is again?

[–]timisher 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of futurama where Hermes sees a payphone and said theirs phones in booths now, great now I don’t have to carry this cell phone everywhere.

[–]180secondideas 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Our phone cord was just long enough to reach into the garage. Spent endless night shivering on the garage step with the door closed talking away to some girl.

Long live the 80s.

[–]Time_Terminal 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's some r/nottheonion material right there.

[–]EnterPlayerTwo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You seem trustworthy.

[–]Evilsnail77 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I want rotary phones back.

[–]zaqwert6 45 points46 points  (56 children)

Nah. They already have wireless charging networks that will charge a device wirelessly from up to 6 feet away. The reality is that pretty soon your device will not even need batteries. And everything one owns will be completely untethered and Mobile.

[–]Dave_ 40 points41 points  (4 children)

I really hope this is a thing, like totally economically feasible and consumers dont fuck it up by running electricity through themselves with tinfoil hats.

[–]10ebbor10 13 points14 points  (3 children)

Ranged charging generally has terrible efficiency, wasting enormous amounts of power.

[–]zixd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So you're telling me they're in league with the power companies

[–]Doxxingisbadmkay 11 points12 points  (0 children)

6 ft for ultra low power sensors. Go further then the headline.

[–]Whatswiththewhip 17 points18 points  (17 children)

I dunno. I watched an MKBHD video on YouTube (so I'm basically an expert) and he said that tech (walking in a room and having your phone charge automatically) is not close to happening.

[–]SomethingSpecialMayb 13 points14 points  (16 children)

The video was correct that isn’t going to happen as described. But, what you will find is that there will be wireless charging points in the arm of the sofa, as part of your desk at work, in the kitchen worktop etc etc. So your battery only has to last as long as you hold it. With increases in charging speed round the corner you may at some point only have to put your phone on the table for 45 seconds to get a full charge.

[–]greenops 22 points23 points  (6 children)

amazing breakthroughs in battery technology is something I see on reddit all the time but never see them in consumer electronics. I'd be skeptical of 45 seconds charging within the next 10 or 15 years personally.

[–]theycallhimthestug 9 points10 points  (3 children)

Jumping from every phone I've ever owned, to the one I'm using now, how fast it charges is definitely a breakthrough in my opinion.

[–]StumbleOn 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Back in 2009 my first smartphone charged in about 5 hours and would drain in about 8 hours of use.

Jump to today, my current phone charges in 45 minutes and lasts a day or two with my level of usage.

[–]velifer 26 points27 points  (13 children)

everything one owns Everything you license, lease, or rent

[–]AbCzar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are real major issues with wireless energy and the tech has not had many significant advancements in many years now. I wouldn't expect that to happen for a long time to come

There's a basic physical limitation to how energy is wirelessly transferred. Unless we're willing to accept much bigger phones that can have bigger coils inside, and big noisy plug in coils as well with loud electric buzzing, it's just not going to happen.

[–]greenops 4 points5 points  (2 children)

Are you sure about that? doesn't the power transfer fall off by magnitudes the further you get away? I thought more than a couple of CM was too far for now?

[–]trojanfl 2 points3 points  (2 children)

With no health effects ?(thinking about cuba)

[–]alexxerth 3 points4 points  (4 children)

I remember I had a corded phone that was plugged into my computer, and I had to type the number I wanted to call into my computer. I thought this was just how phones worked at the time, and only later did I realize barely anybody has any idea what I'm talking about when I describe this.

[–]RS177 2 points3 points  (3 children)

I doubt that. Convenience is what matters and phones are used for more than just calling. Bosses expect immediate responses from workers so the days of the house phone have already passed.

[–]IGotNoStringsOnMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Even if this were to become a thing, we've had "cordless" handset landlines for 30 years. I wouldn't mind a personal cellnetwork hookup in my house, that uses my phone as the "handset". That way im guaranteed to have full signal and network speed in my house on my phone.

Because currently If im on the phone and walk through a hallway, im going to lose that call.

There is ZERO chance people are going to accept the tech sliding that far backward that they would allow themselves to be tethered to the wall like we were in the 80s.

[–]Mrnoone696 10 points11 points  (2 children)


[–]JessicaBecause 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah thought that looked weird. You got it.

[–]wearer_of_boxers 10 points11 points  (0 children)

my batteries dead what? all 30 of my batteries? what happened?

[–]bedelho 160 points161 points  (21 children)

[–]manbruhpig 76 points77 points  (5 children)

Wish it would flood with likes though...

[–]darksidesar 15 points16 points  (5 children)

Someone would just have to create a Live Photo animation using the internals wallpaper

Edit: like this https://instagram.com/p/BUh6gF5gAmq/

Better example: https://youtu.be/FlsZaTgRvbw

[–]Anach 8 points9 points  (2 children)

The perfect wallpaper for those that wish to remain a virgin the rest of their lives.

[–]DarkLameMaster 3 points4 points  (3 children)

Do you know where i can find the wallpaper for iphone 4s? Ty

[–]fattymcfatpants 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Props for keeping a 4S alive this long

[–]sivadneb 65 points66 points  (18 children)

it wouldn't work, unless iPhone X tracked face movements to give a 3D effect...

[–]djlemma 31 points32 points  (11 children)

I was actually wondering if this was part of their face recognition tech. I mean... they do have a camera there with face recognition, it would seem pretty trivial to figure out the location and angle of the viewer's eyes to be able to accomplish this sort of effect.

[–]ProgramTheWorld 16 points17 points  (2 children)

Power consumption is a problem. There are lights at the top that have to constantly flash in order to get the depth information required, and a dedicated chip has to constantly run in order to detect where your face is and then where your eyes at. Then it would have to also wake up a lot of processes just to do 3D graphics and rendering. The battery will be drained very quickly.

[–]djlemma 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I wouldn't think this could work as a background screen, but maybe it could be used for a game or something like that. Combine eye tracking with the front-facing camera, it might be possible to make your phone seem transparent. With eye tracking alone, you could simulate looking around to the sides of a 3D object, making it seem like it's popping out of the screen.

There was a guy doing this stuff with the nintendo Wii like.. a decade ago. He took the IR emitters that normally go in front of your TV, and put them on a pair of glasses. Then he took the wiimote and put it in front of the TV facing the viewer. Boom, eye tracking. Simple and effective.


[–]prim3y 2 points3 points  (4 children)

The phone can do it with the 6-axis accelerometer, but you have to move the phone not your face. Unless, it’s a feature of the facial recognition this is totally fake.

[–]djlemma 5 points6 points  (2 children)

I know the OP GIF is fake, I am just trying to think of how this could be accomplished with existing tech. Not so much for phone background purposes, but for unique games or other sorts of experiences.

[–]prim3y 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well the Animoji do have facial rotation so it probably can do it.

[–]N33chy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There was a phone made by Amazon a few years back with a couple cameras that tracked your face to do things with the background exactly like this. The backgrounds weren't nearly as detailed but the effect was pretty remarkable.

[–]graham025 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Agreed but not the animation just the phone’s components

[–]ivegotapenis 7 points8 points  (1 child)

It won't look nearly as cool. Notice how the perspective changes on the phone screen as the camera moves down? Yeah that won't happen in real life.

[–]Yanjuan 3064 points3065 points  (98 children)

1,000 notifications in less than a minute...this must be some instagram “models” phone

[–]andlius 909 points910 points  (63 children)

Yeah but what IG model posting on reddit still uses facebook?

[–]Yanjuan 510 points511 points  (55 children)

One who still connects with family and takes advantage of all potential marketing platforms

[–]dopamine-delight 102 points103 points  (53 children)

Facebook and models don't really mix. Musicians, artists, and business mix well with facebook but anything dealing with scantily dressed individuals with facebook? Not so much..

[–]PrincetopherLir 129 points130 points  (35 children)

What is the point of this discussion??

[–]dopamine-delight 69 points70 points  (33 children)

Facebook still has conservative values instilled into it.

Are you really going to like and share photos of: Suicide Girls, Jenna Jameson, or Twerking for your mother, grandmother, and Auntie Barbara to see?

[–]cuddlefucker 86 points87 points  (14 children)

This is why Snapchat exists. Parents ruined facebook.

[–]ShampooMohawk42 48 points49 points  (9 children)

right, the parents ruined facebook...

[–]PM_ME_UR_SMILE_GURL 56 points57 points  (6 children)

Parents and companies. Can't even post/tag people in slightly offensive memes cause any further employee might see.

[–]hell2pay 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is so much wrong with FB, beyond parents, that is for sure.

[–]coloradonative16 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I had this thought yesterday

Facebook is an old person thing now, kids these days use Snapchat and what have you.

[–]mrizzerdly 9 points10 points  (5 children)

Facebook was for college students, like back in the stone age. I don't know when it was taken over by old people.

[–]sticknija2 6 points7 points  (1 child)

I'm not friends with my mother on Facebook explicitly so I can share things like that.

[–]dopamine-delight 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Well, you aren't but majority of people who use Facebook will say: I use it to connect with family and friends.

I understand that most folks use SC for intimate dm's and sharing updates on a more personal level versus instagram. Twitter is also used for business, media, modeling because it's really individual based; not staying connected with family.

[–]thechaosguy 61 points62 points  (12 children)

Or a modern day teenage girl. You'd be surprised.

[–]hangmanucf 56 points57 points  (5 children)

I'm a tour guide, and yesterday during my tour I remarked to the teen daughter I was showing around that her photo "should be worth at least twenty likes" and she told me "pffft - for me 200 is a low number."

[–]JustOneProletariat 50 points51 points  (3 children)

I think this is actually a large problem and in the near future we're going to be dealing with a lot of mentally fucked-up people due to this sort of convoluted social media attention shaping young brains, mostly young girls.

There's even evidence behind this.

There's a great talk, I believe done at Stanford or Princeton University, given by one of the ex-executives of Facebook on this subject where he states that social media is essentially ripping apart the social fabric of society, and that high-level individuals involved in these platforms already know this, that's why he quit Facebook.

[–]v-_-v 7 points8 points  (2 children)

Not the video you were talking about, but touches on it, and then goes into overall what companies like this are doing to society.


[–]Angry_Sapphic 7 points8 points  (5 children)

Can confirm, I get >100 (mostly tumblr) notifications per hour at peak time.

[–]Codazoa 12 points13 points  (4 children)

I would go insane! I get about 10 notifications a day and most of them are junk emails.

[–]Angry_Sapphic 6 points7 points  (3 children)

They're silent, and it just becomes "[t]99+ "

[–]Codazoa 8 points9 points  (2 children)

I always try to keep all my apps free of those notification numbers. If I see a 1 I feel like I need to check it.

[–]vector_ejector 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Fitness models


[–]OmarGuard 275 points276 points  (13 children)

I initially thought those likes and upvotes were coming in real time

That'd be a neat feature

[–]bmikey 102 points103 points  (3 children)

With a swipe kicking off the emptying animation. This would be amazing as an actual notification screen.

[–]RubbrBbyBggyBmpr 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Or when you clear your notifications

[–]Sdude216 25 points26 points  (4 children)

I'd ask r/jailbreak to see if that could be a tweak because they have some really talented people there who can do amazing shit like this.

[–]ForceBlade 2 points3 points  (1 child)

It'd be possible but nothing like this. This render probably took hours.

[–]Sdude216 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah but the concept of having notifications appear as small 3D renders of themselves could be done given the correct textures. The "dump" part would probably be impossible.

[–]Mile129 619 points620 points  (73 children)

Okay, where do I get this?

[–]ms_modestly_immodest 622 points623 points  (59 children)

they’re called internal backgrounds and you can find them here (ios) and here (for the pixel)

credit to /u/bucktuck and /u/sgird for finding it :)

[–]obamatheepug 310 points311 points  (52 children)

Doesn't have a 3d effect, would look much better if it had the same 'depth', instead of a flat surface.

[–]ms_modestly_immodest 242 points243 points  (30 children)

agreed, the original gif is just a simulated animation so what i linked is something that’s only trying to simulate the simulation

[–]noxwei 12 points13 points  (16 children)

You could use that as a video and turn on Live Photo’s.

[–]elheber 79 points80 points  (15 children)

It doesn't work that way. The effect only works because the image is only tilting when the camera is tilted (in the gif). You can see the phone and table tilt away when it goes into that "3D" look, and then return to being straight above the phone. To simulate that, the phone would need to use its camera for face-tracking, then it would have to render the scene in relation to where the user is looking from. Like this.

[–]high_lx 9 points10 points  (6 children)

Could that be done? The iPhone X has decend face tracking, although you would first need to get full access to the phone

[–]elheber 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Yeah, it could be done. All that's needed is face tracking (which pretty much all phones can do now) and a decent rendering method. It doesn't even need to be intensive hardware rendering... it could just use depth maps like this.

That said, it'll be draining one's battery more than they'd probably like.

[–]wolfej4 8 points9 points  (5 children)

Do you remember the Fire phone?

Ah, memories.

[–]texasconsult 8 points9 points  (12 children)

You know a 3D effect would be impossible unless the phone had some 3 dimensional pixels or the phone tracks the angle from which you're viewing at and adjusts the image.

[–]N1ghtshade3 24 points25 points  (5 children)

Nah, parallax live wallpapers are absolutely a thing on Android. Check out the video, it's pretty ridiculous: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.in.w3d&hl=en

[–]Fellhuhn 13 points14 points  (3 children)

But they react on phone orientation, not your eyes. But as users tend to tilt the phone and not their head the difference isn't very noticable.

[–]cluckcock 4 points5 points  (2 children)

the new 3DS has a glasses-free parallax display it could achieve this.

[–]HakimeHomewreckru 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm sure the RED Hydrogen will be able to do stuff like this.

[–]Paffmassa 3 points4 points  (1 child)

I just found the still images of the background without all the moving aspects that this gif shows. Am I missing something?

[–]Kamanaoku 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Here is one for iPhone 6s!

[–]ichantz 4 points5 points  (1 child)

This is prerendered CGI using Blender, even the wood and headphones.

[–]nicolasap 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The number of people not getting this is frustrating... This animation (that isn't even a proof of concept for any f*ing technology!) Is so realistic that people start missing the point that it's a render, leading to the paradox that nobody is appreciating a very fine show of CGI skills! (arguing about 3D technology that isn't here yet and how you can get a gif wallpaper...)

/u/offshootuk is a great 3D animator, not an Apple engineer!

[–]andlius 214 points215 points  (15 children)

/r/simulated would love this

[–]sentimental_goat 134 points135 points  (9 children)

Looks like everyone asking for the background doesn't realize this.

[–]motocyclisme 43 points44 points  (2 children)

I just want an HD background of my phone internals, it looks pretty neat. I'm aware it's a simulated animation.

[–]Okeano_ 5 points6 points  (5 children)

Don't realize what? The smart phones today have the computational power and hardware required for this as a lock screen. Batteries won't last long with it on however.

[–]lind_p 25 points26 points  (1 child)

I'm pretty sure r/simulated made this

[–]onionnion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yup. Top of that sub already.

[–]Woobier49 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They already posted it before this one

[–]jakabo27 49 points50 points  (7 children)

Too bad iPhones can't set gifs as wallpapers:(

[–]UpperEchelon666 31 points32 points  (3 children)

Live wallpapers are a step in the right direction. Sucks you have to have 3D Touch though

[–]MarcoGeovanni 5 points6 points  (2 children)

And it only works on the lock screen

[–]Doc_The_God 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Actually with the app intoLive you can turn any video or gif into a live photo and set it as a live wallpaper :)

[–]accidentalpolitics 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Actually you can! The process is quite troublesome though because it requires jailbreaking your phone.

[–]Genetic_outlier 123 points124 points  (6 children)

I thought this was an art piece commenting on the ridiculous number of notifications on our mobile devices. To show how useless they are now that there are so many, they just get dumped in the trash without being read.

[–]offshootuk[S] 57 points58 points  (2 children)

Nah not really making any statement but i love your interpretation.

[–]chooxy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Erm no, Death of the Author, you don't have control over the message.


[–]hackersaq 6 points7 points  (1 child)

Yep - that's exactly what happens with completely default notification settings, having not taken 2 minutes to properly configure the phone following an app installation.

[–]Ironfishy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

With every new app, also they keep moving settings to locations hard to find. There is no common sense anymore, it's "what can we do to make you use our app as much as possible".

[–]bucktuck 119 points120 points  (8 children)

[–]Mixairian 34 points35 points  (2 children)

They got an animated version, or Android version out there?

[–]RubbrBbyBggyBmpr 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I had one for my Google pixel 2. I got it on Reddit but don't remember where. Probably the Pixel sub

[–]Sun_Beams 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Were can I get some of those upvote notifications?

[–]rhm2084 45 points46 points  (1 child)

Speaking of animated wallpapers this one is beautiful

[–]astrophysicist__98 28 points29 points  (5 children)

What black mirror episode is this

[–]0verStrike 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I want to eat those. I imagine them as sour as Skittles.

[–]Dr_ake1 20 points21 points  (1 child)

Ok, this is real cool

[–]RandomRedditor32905 4 points5 points  (0 children)

After showing too much skin on IG

[–]RageMojo 4 points5 points  (1 child)

This fills me with the same kind of horror the Black Mirror episode about getting likes did.

[–]TheWingedCherryPie 4 points5 points  (2 children)

They look like those marshmallows in the Lucky Charms cereal

I kinda wanna eat them

[–]keystoneg 4 points5 points  (2 children)

I'm confused. Why does the perspective change with the camera view? I can see if you had the phone in your hand and the perspective changed as the phone tilted, but isn't it propped on a stationary surface? What is making the perspective shift?

[–]farmdve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is clearly fake. Not enough Facebook likes.

[–]Deeze_Rmuh_Nudds 4 points5 points  (0 children)


[–]ilostthegame9 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Does anyone have that background without the notifications? I’d love to have it.

[–]Evey9207 8 points9 points  (1 child)

Well, I Googled iPhone internals and got this one.

[–]TxEagleDeathclaw81 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s pretty cool but don’t know i would want to be that popular.

[–]zcforlife 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can someone make this into a live wallpaper for the iPhone X

[–]kid_tiger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I want this background. Anyone know if its a real thing and can download it?

[–]addictive_sapian 2 points3 points  (2 children)

How can I get the initial image? I want it for my background

[–]albus_scirocco 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have absolutely no idea what's happening here...

[–]Mac_DG 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Okay, I can live without the 3D effects. Just the internals + dump is epic.

[–]RelaxYaFuck 2 points3 points  (0 children)

143rd time this has been reposted, great work

[–]raging_asshole 20 points21 points  (3 children)

i don't let fucking ANYTHING give me notifications.

phone, you work for ME, when i want something, i'll let you know. i honestly don't understand wanting a tug on your sleeve every time someone does something on a social media platform.

[–]vampyrita 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Eh, I like it for messaging apps. I like to know when people want to talk to me

Which definitley happens

All the time

oh god I'm so lonely

[–]HotVings 28 points29 points  (0 children)

username checks out

[–]Insert_Clever_Login 3 points4 points  (4 children)

Any way you could upload a photo of the first frame only of the screen and without the text on the screen so we could have a background image of the internals with the depth that you've given? It just looks so good...

Side note, the smallest details in this make it over the top awesome :)