Reddit Feeds

Sign up and stay connected to your favorite communities.

sign uplog in

Slight confusion with STP

Maybe I'm just thinking too hard on this, trying to separate 802.1d / 802.1w in my head, and how the Cisco version play in to the standards.

So my question is mainly this: if we are using 802.1q, and Cisco devices default to PVST (IEEE), which only works with ISL, is STP actually even running in this situation?

Also, do I understand the standards correctly?

CST (STP, IEEE) - 802.1d (802.1q)
PVST - 802.1d (ISL)
PVST+ - 802.1d (802.1q)

RSTP - 802.1w (802.1q)
RPVST+ 802.1w (802.1q)

Is this correct?

86% Upvoted
What are your thoughts? Log in or Sign uplog insign up
Networking Student2 points·3 months ago

From my Scaling Networks Companion Guide v6:

  • 802.1d is the original STP standard and is also known as CST (Common Spanning Tree). One spanning-tree instance for the entire bridged network, no matter how many vlans you have

  • 802.1d is the same standard for PVST+, which is the Cisco enhancement of the original STP, and allows a seperate spanning-tree instance for each vlan

  • 802.1w is the standard defined for Rapid STP (RSTP), and its only difference from the original STP is faster convergence

  • Rapid PVST+ is Cisco's enhancement of RSTP, therefore it uses the 802.1w standard as well

  • MSTP has the standard 802.1s

I couldn't exactly remember off the top of my head. You should get that book, it saved my life and helped me pass my practical + exam :D

Original Poster1 point·3 months ago

Right on thank you.
So it would appear the PVST isn’t part of a standard then, as it only inter operates with an ISL infrastructure

Networking Student1 point·3 months ago

I would imagine so, yeah

note that there is pvst and pvst+. pvst is the one that will only work with ISL, whereas PVST+ will work with 802.1q

That was a point of confusion for me to.

CCIE1 point·3 months ago

I can't believe isl is still taught, it's nowhere in real world environments

PracticalNetworking.net1 point·3 months ago

Seriously. Even modern Cisco switches don't support it anymore. =)

Networking Student1 point·3 months ago

this is what I've been thinking while going through some of the Cisco stuff. like, mention it sure but what's the point in anything more???

Community Details





Create Post

r/ccna Rules

No posting of illegal materials
No posting of braindumps
Be courteous and helpful
Don't ask others to complete your labs
Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.