×
all 19 comments

[–]OC-BotFlair Bot[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Thank you for your Original Content, /u/JoDi2019! I've added your flair as gratitude. Here is some important information about this post:

I hope this sticky assists you in having an informed discussion in this thread, or inspires you to remix this data. For more information, please read this Wiki page.

[–]FM-101 7 points8 points  (7 children)

As a Norwegian i feel like this accurate. Things are pretty "easy" for most people here.
Then again, we only have a population of like 5 million people, so i guess it makes sense.

[–]amaureaOC: 6 4 points5 points  (4 children)

Then again, we only have a population of like 5 million people, so i guess it makes sense.

How so? Why would it be easier to make ends meet in a small country?

[–]informat3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's easier to get social programs implemented in a smaller country because everyone views themselves as one "community".

[–]Quantentheorie 2 points3 points  (2 children)

It usually makes unemployment less of an issue to have fewer people. Individual manpower is less expendable. Thus higher and minimum wage.

[–]amaureaOC: 6 4 points5 points  (1 child)

I don't follow. Why is individual manpower less expendable? In a smaller country there are fewer workers, but also less demand for work.

[–]Quantentheorie 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the scaling is a little bit off, it's not perfectly linear. There is a certain minimum of manpower you need to run a country and a certain threshold till which it is more efficient to use people over machines. The smaller a country is the more it profits from this.

Think of china. They have all the people, but at the same time that means they can also profit more from bigger factories and more automatisation and they can govern that many people with a way more efficient administration-to-population relationship.

[–]geoffreygreene 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, not so sure about the size link. I live in Ireland currently (pop: 4.5M), and it's close to the top of the list, with 12% of households in great economic difficulty (placing it right down with problematic economies like Portugal, Spain, Italy and even Eastern European countries like Hungary and Romania that have a massive net migration to the West). It's also one of the richest countries in Europe and the world per capita, so it's not from lack of resources. Ireland, furthermore, is very homogeneous and well-educated. It doesn't have oil like Norway, but neither does the other Nordic countries. Last year, it had the highest GDP growth rate in the world, but people outside of Dublin (and maybe Cork) have been largely left behind.

[–]evangelia96 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I don't mean to brag but we have a population of ~1 million and we still manage to be right up there at number 3.

[–]JoDi2019OC: 42[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Share of households making ends meet with great difficulty [4591x3196]

source: Eurostat

more data: https://jodi.graphics/2018/01/13/share-households-making-ends-meet-great-difficulty/

tools used: Photoshop, OpenOffice Calc, MapChart

[–]Czech1201 1 point2 points  (1 child)

And then there is Czech republic (for some unknown reason blue in this chart), where your average salary is $12-13K a year while buying a flat at normal size of 100 square meters to fit your family of 4 is worth $400k and yet people wonder why there are so many young people living with parents.

[–]Murzinio 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's similar in Poland, and as far as I know many Eastern European countries.

[–]DrDerpberg 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Interesting that some of the more expensive countries are lower on the list. I figured even countries like Switzerland must have manual laborers and uneducated people not earning a ton of money, and that combined with a high cost of living it'd be pretty tough to not earn a lot there.

[–]skapade 3 points4 points  (1 child)

In rich countries everyone gets paid more, even the people at the lowest end of the scale.

I work a minimum wage type of job, and in Sweden my base hourly pay is like 75% more than what it would be in the UK, plus tons of benefits like extra pay on evenings/weekends/nights that I wouldn't be getting in the UK. I have a family in the UK who work the exact same job as me and they live in terrible flats in tower blocks that reek of piss, and the highlights of their year are a long weekend in mallorca and the odd trip to London on a hen night. More or less. Whereas I live in a modern newly renovated flat in a nice area and I spend 5-6 weeks a year travelling abroad.

Quite a big difference and even then the UK is better than most of Europe.

[–]geoffreygreene 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The UK, US, and Ireland are all of the same bleak neoliberal sink-or-swim system. My wife comes from a "Rust Belt" town in Central Sweden, and her relatives and childhood friends live modestly, but decently. Compare their lives with their counterparts in Ireland or the US, and you see how differently Nordic societies think of their collective responsibilities to each other. That old British term "Commonwealth" comes to mind. I wish it would make a comeback in the Anglophone world.

[–]urbanachiever77 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too bad there isn't equivalent data for other countries outside of Europe. Would be super interesting to see.

Great work, thanks!