all 7 comments

[–]OC-BotFlair Bot[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Thank you for your Original Content, /u/Kalkberg! I've added your flair as gratitude. Here is some important information about this post:

I hope this sticky assists you in having an informed discussion in this thread, or inspires you to remix this data. For more information, please read this Wiki page.

[–]KalkbergOC: 1[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)


Python with matplotlib (left panel) and cartopy (right panel)

Some touch up work in Illustrator

Data Source:


Fun idea given to me by a friend.

[–]theramenrater 1 point2 points  (2 children)

These are scored by the quarter point. When I give a 3.5 and it is rounded to a 4,this is worthless. It's like taking a C grade and making it a B grade. Would like to see my scores handled a little more accurately.

[–]KalkbergOC: 1[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I don't round anything. For example, the average for Japan is 3.981605113636364, and that's the value I use when generating the plots. I SHOULD be rounding it to a 4.0 to maintain the number of significant figures you use, but I don't for the sake of accuracy.

Keep up the good work, and thanks for making your data accessible!

[–]theramenrater 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I mean each individual review's score - there's a chart out there showing that most of my reviews get 4 stars which is definitely inaccurate as 3.5 is definitely the most common score I give.