However Palestine never agrees to that because they want it all...
The PA has consistently offered to a peace agreement with the 1967 Green Line as the border, and for the past decade and a half publicly agreed to swap territory across that border for territory of equal size and quality.
If you intend to present bald-faced lies to justify the murder of civilians, at least make it less obvious.
The Green Line borders are unacceptable. You can’t expect Israel to fight 4 wars against enemies that would like to destroy them and their people, then cede the land they took back to those same enemies. This is utter foolishness. No country in modern times would voluntarily do that nor should they be expected to.
The Green Line borders are unacceptable.
Despite the fact that the only territory to which Israel has any claim is on its side of the Green Line (and you are advocating a war crime), it's a good thing that
for the past decade and a half publicly agreed to swap territory across that border for territory of equal size and quality.
You also seem to have no basis for your claim that
No country in modern times would voluntarily do that nor should they be expected to.
In fact, it was codification of the Nuremberg Principles after WWII that found that the acquisition of territory by military conquest is illegitimate, so what you are suggesting is the exact OPPOSITE of what how countries "in modern times" are expected to act.
You might recall the "Coalition of the Willing" invading Iraq in 1990 based on exactly that principle.
So, obviously, states are expected to comply with that principle. It is only the United States enabling Israel's pattern of ongoing crimes against humanity through the use of its veto in the UNSC that allows Israel to act with impunity.
Regardless of the Nuremberg Principles, if a country is invaded three times with the explicit goal of taking their land, and at the end of those wars said country decides to take land from the nations who invaded them, i have no problem with it and I think anyone who does is delusional. Additionally, I’m not sure what universe you’re living in that invading a country, deposing its leader, establishing a government you’d prefer, then fighting the forces in a nation that resist (Iraq) doesn’t practically amount to the “acquisition of territory by military conquest.”
United States enabling Israel’s pattern of ongoing crimes against humanity.
Look at the image above. No. Don’t skip if that’s what you were going to do. *Really look at that image. Imagine living with your family on a border that looks like that, regardless of how you got there. Does that look like a safe state under which the moralistic principles of perfectly carried out relations with a violent neighbor can occur? A good portion of the West Bank is insistent on making sure Israel *no longer exists**. Israel is fighting a dedicated enemy that looks and sounds like every other citizen of the state of Israel. Difficult times require difficult decisions.
PS: The US seeks and has sought to protect its more rogue ally just as China does with North Korea and Russia does with Syria. Strong nations support their allies.