×

Utopia by dem0lecule in LateStageCapitalism

[–]MLPorsche 31 points32 points  (0 children)

exactly, which is why the capitalist shouldn't be paid for the work of the workers

abolish all forms of passive income

‘there is evidence that more people died under Allende’s regime than under the junta controlled by Pinochet’ (among other lies). by Anarcho-Bolshevik in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]MLPorsche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

how do you keep coming across this shit, do you regularly follow conservative/libertarian sources just in case they post the most "out there" article?

Socialists, Communists and Collectivists of all stripes, why are capitalists and individualists necessary(and arguably forced to) to participate in your system for it to work? by McDrMuffinMan in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]MLPorsche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the point is that the trade can be learned without the need of workplace hierarchy and an employer which gets paid for your work

this would create individuals of workers who worked where they wanted to, rather than just taking up jobs to make ends meet, making a socialist society more individualistic by observation

Oh really? I have bad news there my friend. You owe taxes and you need to read up on employment regulations.

those regulations were put in place to prevent revolution, anyway the government is protecting the bourgeois property claim, thus pointing at the government doesn't remove the point

What does it mean for Marxism to be "unfalsifiable"? by CyJackX in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]MLPorsche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this comment would work if Marx made a moral argument against capitalism, but he never did, all his argument were economical and based on the contradictions of capitalism

Fully Automated LSC by dem0lecule in LateStageCapitalism

[–]MLPorsche 9 points10 points  (0 children)

How does he have a phd with blind faith in the market?

Socialists, Communists and Collectivists of all stripes, why are capitalists and individualists necessary(and arguably forced to) to participate in your system for it to work? by McDrMuffinMan in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]MLPorsche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They do, employment is trade.

for sustenance of the worker, not for the employer

The only middleman in employment is the government.

how, there is no interaction with the government when you subjugate yourself to your employers hierarchy

class consciousness spreading in r /cars by MLPorsche in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]MLPorsche[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

i like the car (pagani huayra) but the facts are pretty simple, most struggle to make ends meet and it is possible to change the situation, but no one does anything

Socialists, Communists and Collectivists of all stripes, why are capitalists and individualists necessary(and arguably forced to) to participate in your system for it to work? by McDrMuffinMan in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]MLPorsche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well both could also benefit through free association as the means of production would then be available for all without the middleman of an employer

Socialists, Communists and Collectivists of all stripes, why are capitalists and individualists necessary(and arguably forced to) to participate in your system for it to work? by McDrMuffinMan in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]MLPorsche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why should the workers collectively make the capitalist wealthier through their work, seems hypocritical by someone who claims to be an individualist

Here's Why the Pagani Huayra Is Worth $3 Million - Doug DeMuro by cupred in cars

[–]MLPorsche 37 points38 points  (0 children)

yes the pagani huayra is special but it's got nothing on Goeff Hammerhead i-Eaglethrust

hope you can review it

Meet Karl Marx, the savior of the state apparatus. by [deleted] in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]MLPorsche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He ignored the root and thereby enabled the survival of the true system of oppression: Statism.

this seem like circular fallacy, saying that the save survives because of statism is like saying water is a liquid because of waterism

he attacks a state of existence of society but not how how or why it was formed

[everyone] is free speech limited by your ideology? And if so why by felix_odegard in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]MLPorsche 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Freedom of speech and freedom of facing the consequenses of your speech

Eugh by warrior20195 in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]MLPorsche 20 points21 points  (0 children)

of course they encourage the 996 philosophy, it doesn't affect them

Xbox is communist! by QueerGirlAudrey in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]MLPorsche 11 points12 points  (0 children)

PC gaming represent (anarcho) capitalism

so fascism, good to know

[all] You thoughts on retailers destroying unsold goods? by Bergspaziergang in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]MLPorsche 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well then your entire stupid free market argument falls apart

as usual when you apply logic to it

Top fuel dragsters are incredible. by raydialseeker in cars

[–]MLPorsche 7 points8 points  (0 children)

just for reference, the rumored koenigsegg ragnarok is going to do 0-400kph in 14 seconds, a top fuel dragster is more than 3 times faster to the same speed