my subscriptions
lurkergroove commented on a post in r/AskReddit
Vanetia 5 points

Since... always.

I don't think that's accurate.

lurkergroove 2 points

Also gender-neutral terms have been around for centuries and have dominated literature, read this.

somepeoplewait 4 points

But they literally are not the same. Gender is the social construct. It's the cultural identity we associate with being male or female. As well as the psychological traits. Gender is the actual identity, sex is biology.

One's biology doesn't always match their gender.

Also, this isn't a "PC thing." These are the literal, accepted definitions. And it has been proven time and time again that when your gender doesn't match your biological sex, it is extremely detrimental to one's mental health to conform to the gender of their biological sex. It has been proven that it is psychologically essential for transgender people to be able to transition.

lurkergroove 3 points

Moreover, some people are born intersex. The very existence of those people that are intersex disrupts this whole outdated notion of defining what a female or male is based off of one's anatomy.

lurkergroove commented on a post in r/AskReddit
forman98 682 points

The crazy thing is that there are currently two people out there who have not met yet, that will one day put a sperm with an egg and slowly develop an entire other person who will then have their own independent thoughts and experiences.

Like it all starts with 1 sperm and 1 egg. A small bundle of molecules in a certain arrangement that is then continually built upon until a human being is produced. So plants are sort of the same, but then humans end up having this thing called consciousness. Is that just a result of tons of molecules working together with some electricity? Isn't that what a robot is? Just how developed are our brains? How do we have the ability to imagine things that have never existed before using only a bunch of molecules and some electricity?

lurkergroove 2 points

You might be interested in a position like panpsychism, which argues that because of the absurdity of getting subjective experience from a bunch of molecules and some electricity - as you mention - consciousness must be a fundamental property of our universe. It's garnering popularity among some fields. So, consciousness might be as basic to our worlds as space and time are. In this view, plants might be conscious, insects, animals of all kinds - even atoms to varying degrees.

justcommenter 3 points

It indeed is a terrible analogy and a bad argument in general. Programs like AlphaGo or DeepBlue have excellent prioritization systems when they must find out which moves in a game such as chess or go are good, but we don't call them conscious because there is no evidence of those programs having a subjective experience.

lurkergroove 2 points

Don't you just love when a redditor starts a post with "it's quite simple really" and goes on to answer a fundamental human mystery that's plagued the most brilliant minds of history. Paging /r/iamverysmart.

lurkergroove commented on a post in r/gradadmissions
lurkergroove 2 points

Have you considered emailing the department quite simply saying that you realized your writing sample had some formatting issues when uploading, and attaching your sample in the email. I'm sure they'd take it. Otherwise, I'm sure most everyone has some form of error in their writing sample, don't sweat it.

lurkergroove commented on a post in r/gradadmissions
Cesettle 4 points
  1. 11 PhD programs in genetics
  2. All in the US
  3. 2 dream, 3 reach, 4 match, 3 safeties

I currently have interviews scheduled with 1 dream, 1 reach, 3 match, and 1 safety (and have yet to hear back from all others).

lurkergroove 3 points

Haha I like your categorization of dream, good luck

lurkergroove commented on a post in r/gradadmissions
lurkergroove 1 point

That's an odd question, but you can frame it in a positive way. Say I have weakness X, but I have been employing strategies Y and Z to improve myself.

For example, you can say I have trouble procrastinating at times so I've been implementing a schedule or whatever. They're just trying to gauge out if you're mature enough to introspect and recognize you have areas to work on (like we all do).

lurkergroove commented on a post in r/gradadmissions
lurkergroove 1 point

Don't sweat it. Colleges typically don't care if recommenders send in their letters anywhere from 1-2 weeks after the deadline. They know academics can be busy and a bit absent-minded. They won't even begin reviewing applications till a couple of weeks after the deadline. Just make sure you've sent out the request.

multiplemisdirection 6 points

Totally. It’s such a bizarrely slow and opaque process, and I find writing about myself incredibly exhausting (and also not very exciting in comparison to any of the actual work I have on my hands). But it has to be done! Good luck.

lurkergroove 4 points

Agreed, the opacity really sucks. And much of the advice I've been giving on the SOP is to tread a fine line between "seeming to settled on my views" but "not seeming like I'm too open" or "enlisting and appealing certain faculty members" but "being open enough to attract others". It's bizzare.

Good luck to you too!

boxedcats 7 points

I feel this! I just know i’ll feel so great when its all done and its just about waiting to get into a school

lurkergroove 5 points

This is the only thing getting me through too.

Load more comments
2,021 Karma
835 Post Karma
1,186 Comment Karma

Following this user will show all the posts they make to their profile on your front page.

About lurkergroove

  • Reddit Birthday

    July 23, 2015

Other Interesting Profiles

    Want to make posts on your
    own profile?

    Sign up to test the Reddit post to profile beta.

    Sign up